Magnesium hydroxide (MDH) flame retardant for cable materials?

Cable fires can cause panic and danger in seconds. They damage equipment and risk lives.

Magnesium hydroxide (MDH) is a non-toxic, halogen-free flame retardant used in cable compounds. It decomposes endothermically around 330 °C. The process releases water vapor that cools and dilutes flammable gases, slowing flame spread.

Next, explore how MDH is applied in cable and polymer compounding. This insight will guide safer material choices.

Applications of MDH in Cable and Polymer Compounding

Designing halogen-free cables can feel risky when fire safety is key. Choosing the right additive becomes critical under strict standards.

MDH is added at 40–60 % by weight to PVC compounds, XLPE insulation, rubber sheathing, and thermoplastics. It grants halogen-free flame retardancy while ensuring mechanical strength and processing stability across diverse cable and polymer blends.

Key Applications and Benefits

Application	MDH Loading (%)	Key Benefit
PVC Cables	40–55	Halogen-free retardancy, low smoke emission
XLPE Insulation	45–60	High thermal stability, enhanced safety
Rubber Sheathing	50–65	Improved flexibility, superior fire resistance
Thermoplastics	35–50	Non-toxic flame retardancy, good processability

I first tested MDH in a PVC cable batch five years ago. I saw improved fire ratings and minimal smoke. The compound extruded smoothly at 190 °C without any die build-up. This success led me to trial MDH in XLPE insulation. The mix held together under standard mixing and curing steps. It gave a V-0 rating in UL 94 tests.

In PVC cables, MDH makes up nearly half of the formulation. It must blend well with plasticizers and stabilizers. I use a two-stage mixing process. First stage at 150 °C disperses MDH in base resin. Second stage at 180–190 °C bonds MDH to polymer. This method avoids hot spots and ensures uniform dispersion. Uniform mixing prevents filler agglomeration, which can weaken the cable.

In XLPE insulation, MDH loading reaches up to 60 %. This level meets halogen-free standards such as IEC 60754 for low gas toxicity. I mix MDH at 140 °C with crosslinkable polyethylene. A peroxide initiator then crosslinks at 180 °C. The resulting compound shows a reduction in peak heat release rate by 45 % in cone calorimeter tests.

For rubber sheathing, I combine MDH with EPDM or NBR. Loadings of 55–65 % give cables fire performance to VW-1 ratings. I press-cure mixtures at 160 °C. The elastomer matrix holds MDH particles in place. The sheaths resist cracking and dripping under flame.

Thermoplastics like ABS or nylon need halogen-free flame retardants. MDH fits well here too. Loadings of 35–50 % deliver UL 94 V-1 or V-0 ratings. I often blend MDH with surface treatments like silanes to improve adhesion. This yields smooth finishes without haze. The treated MDH disperses well, and polymer flow remains stable.

Application	MDH Loading	Mixing Process & Temperatures	Key Performance / Standards Achieved
PVC Cables	~50%	1. Stage 1: 150 °C – disperse MDH in base resin
2. Stage 2: 180–190 °C – bond to polymer	• Avoids hot spots
• Uniform dispersion prevents filler agglomeration
XLPE Insulation	Up to 60%	1. 140 °C – mix MDH with crosslinkable PE
2. 180 °C – peroxide-initiated crosslink	• Meets IEC 60754 halogen-free low-toxicity standard
• 45% reduction in peak heat release rate (cone calorimeter)
Rubber Sheathing	55–65%	160 °C – press-cure MDH with EPDM or NBR	• VW-1 flame-resistance rating
• Sheath resists cracking and dripping
Thermoplastics	35–50%	Blend MDH (silanized surface-treated) at standard ABS/nylon processing temperatures	• UL 94 V-1 or V-0 rating
• Smooth, haze-free finish with stable polymer flow

Critical factors for compounding include particle size and surface treatment. I use MDH grades with D50 of 1–3 µm. Smaller particles disperse uniformly but cost more. Surface treatments enhance compatibility and reduce viscosity peaks. I balance cost with application needs. For low-smoke cables in tunnels, I choose high-purity, fine MDH with silane treatment. For standard outdoor cables, coarser, untreated MDH works and lowers cost.

Environmental aspects matter too. MDH is non-toxic and leaves no corrosive residues. This is vital in enclosed spaces like subways. The absence of halogens means no HCl release. This protects adjacent equipment and reduces cleanup costs after a fire.

Processing ease is another advantage. MDH requires no special equipment. It feeds in like other fillers. I store MDH in a dry area to avoid moisture uptake. Moisture can cause foaming during extrusion. Regular moisture checks keep the process stable.

In summary, MDH’s role in cable and polymer compounding spans PVC, XLPE, rubber, and thermoplastics. Its halogen-free nature, fire performance, and processing compatibility make it a top choice for safer, sustainable materials.

MDH vs. ATH: What’s the Difference in Flame Retardant Performance?

Selecting the right flame retardant can be tough when cost, performance, and processing conditions conflict. Clear comparison helps make the best choice.

MDH and ATH both release water vapor when heated but differ in decomposition temperatures (MDH ~330 °C vs ATH ~200 °C). MDH suits higher processing temps and offers denser char, while ATH is lower cost and effective in PVC at moderate temperatures.

Comparative Performance Analysis

Criterion	MDH	ATH
Decomposition Temp (°C)	300–330	180–200
Heat Absorption (kJ/mol)	81	105
Smoke Generation	Low	Very low
Residue Quality	Dense MgO char	Stable Al₂O₃ char
Processing Temp (°C)	Up to 220	Up to 190
Cost Factor	1.5× ATH	Baseline
Environmental Impact	Non-toxic, no halogens	Non-toxic, no halogens

Thermal Stability and Processing

• MDH remains stable up to 210 °C, avoiding premature water release and foam defects during compounding.
• ATH can start foaming if the processing temperature exceeds its optimal window (typically below 190 °C).

Flame‐Retardant Performance

Property	MDH	ATH
Char Barrier	Denser, thicker char slows heat transfer	Thinner char layer
Cone Calorimeter Smoke Reduction	40 % reduction in smoke optical density	50 % reduction (slightly better)
Ideal Applications	High‐temperature polymers, tunnels, submarines	PVC cables, moderate‐temperature uses

Cost Considerations

• Unit Cost: MDH is roughly 1.5× more expensive than ATH.
• Loading Level: MDH often requires ~10 % less filler to meet high‐temperature fire ratings, offsetting some cost difference.
• Recommended Use:
  • MDH for critical infrastructure and high‐temperature applications.
  • ATH for large‐volume, cost‐sensitive PVC cable runs.

Environmental Impact

• Both MDH and ATH are halogen‐free and non‐toxic.
• MDH by-product: MgO (magnesium oxide).
• ATH by-product: Al₂O₃ (aluminum oxide).
• Both materials support circular economy goals and can be recycled.

Real-World Example

• XLPE Power Cable (90 °C rating)
  • Compound processed at 200 °C with MDH.
  • Passed IEC 60332-3 flame test.
  • ATH risked early water release and melt instability.
• PVC-Sheathed Cable (180 °C processing)
  • ATH at 55 % loading achieved UL 94 V-0.
  • Cost-effective and met performance requirements.

Key Selection Factors

1. Processing Temperature
2. Target Fire Rating
3. Smoke Density Limits
4. Mechanical Property Retention
5. Material Cost

---

Conclusion

MDH and ATH both offer effective flame retardancy. MDH suits high-temp and dense char needs. ATH provides cost-effective, low-temp performance. Choose based on application and processing demands.